Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x1)))) → 1(0(1(1(x1))))
1(0(0(1(x1)))) → 0(0(0(0(x1))))

Q is empty.


QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x1)))) → 1(0(1(1(x1))))
1(0(0(1(x1)))) → 0(0(0(0(x1))))

Q is empty.

We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

0(0(0(0(x1)))) → 1(0(1(1(x1))))
1(0(0(1(x1)))) → 0(0(0(0(x1))))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))

Q is empty.

We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

0(0(0(0(x1)))) → 1(0(1(1(x1))))
1(0(0(1(x1)))) → 0(0(0(0(x1))))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(0(x1))
01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 11(1(x1))
11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(0(0(x1)))
11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(0(0(0(x1))))
01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 11(x1)
01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 01(1(1(x1)))
11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(x1)
01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 11(0(1(1(x1))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x1)))) → 1(0(1(1(x1))))
1(0(0(1(x1)))) → 0(0(0(0(x1))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(0(x1))
01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 11(1(x1))
11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(0(0(x1)))
11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(0(0(0(x1))))
01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 11(x1)
01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 01(1(1(x1)))
11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(x1)
01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 11(0(1(1(x1))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x1)))) → 1(0(1(1(x1))))
1(0(0(1(x1)))) → 0(0(0(0(x1))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the rule removal processor [15] with the following polynomial ordering [25], at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:

11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(0(x1))
01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 11(1(x1))
11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(0(0(x1)))
01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 11(x1)
01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 01(1(1(x1)))
11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(x1)


Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1   
POL(01(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   
POL(1(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1   
POL(11(x1)) = 2 + 2·x1   



↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
QDP
          ↳ Narrowing

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(0(0(0(x1))))
01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 11(0(1(1(x1))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x1)))) → 1(0(1(1(x1))))
1(0(0(1(x1)))) → 0(0(0(0(x1))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule 01(0(0(0(x1)))) → 11(0(1(1(x1)))) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:

01(0(0(0(0(0(1(x0))))))) → 11(0(1(0(0(0(0(x0)))))))



↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

01(0(0(0(0(0(1(x0))))))) → 11(0(1(0(0(0(0(x0)))))))
11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(0(0(0(x1))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x1)))) → 1(0(1(1(x1))))
1(0(0(1(x1)))) → 0(0(0(0(x1))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The finiteness of this DP problem is implied by strong termination of a SRS due to [12].


↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x1)))) → 1(0(1(1(x1))))
1(0(0(1(x1)))) → 0(0(0(0(x1))))
01(0(0(0(0(0(1(x0))))))) → 11(0(1(0(0(0(0(x0)))))))
11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(0(0(0(x1))))

Q is empty.

We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

0(0(0(0(x1)))) → 1(0(1(1(x1))))
1(0(0(1(x1)))) → 0(0(0(0(x1))))
01(0(0(0(0(0(1(x0))))))) → 11(0(1(0(0(0(0(x0)))))))
11(0(0(1(x1)))) → 01(0(0(0(x1))))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

Q is empty.

We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(0(1(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
01(0(0(0(0(0(1(x))))))) → 11(0(1(0(0(0(0(x)))))))
11(0(0(1(x)))) → 01(0(0(0(x))))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                    ↳ QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(0(1(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
01(0(0(0(0(0(1(x))))))) → 11(0(1(0(0(0(0(x)))))))
11(0(0(1(x)))) → 01(0(0(0(x))))

Q is empty.

We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(0(1(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
01(0(0(0(0(0(1(x))))))) → 11(0(1(0(0(0(0(x)))))))
11(0(0(1(x)))) → 01(0(0(0(x))))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                    ↳ QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS
                      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(0(1(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
01(0(0(0(0(0(1(x))))))) → 11(0(1(0(0(0(0(x)))))))
11(0(0(1(x)))) → 01(0(0(0(x))))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

12(0(0(11(x)))) → 02(01(x))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(0(1(x)))
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(x)))
12(0(0(11(x)))) → 02(0(01(x)))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 02(1(x))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(1(0(1(x))))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(0(1(0(11(x)))))
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(x))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(x)
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(x)
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 12(0(11(x)))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(0(0(1(0(11(x))))))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(1(0(11(x))))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(11(x))
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(0(x))))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
12(0(0(11(x)))) → 02(0(0(01(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                    ↳ QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
QDP
                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

12(0(0(11(x)))) → 02(01(x))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(0(1(x)))
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(x)))
12(0(0(11(x)))) → 02(0(01(x)))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 02(1(x))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(1(0(1(x))))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(0(1(0(11(x)))))
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(x))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(x)
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(x)
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 12(0(11(x)))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(0(0(1(0(11(x))))))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(1(0(11(x))))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(11(x))
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(0(x))))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
12(0(0(11(x)))) → 02(0(0(01(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 8 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                    ↳ QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
QDP
                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(0(1(x)))
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(0(x))))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(x)))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 02(1(x))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(1(0(1(x))))
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(x))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(x)
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the rule removal processor [15] with the following polynomial ordering [25], at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:

02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(0(1(x)))
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(x)))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 02(1(x))
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(x))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(x)
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(x)


Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1   
POL(01(x1)) = x1   
POL(02(x1)) = 2 + x1   
POL(1(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1   
POL(11(x1)) = x1   
POL(12(x1)) = 2 + x1   



↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                    ↳ QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                            ↳ QDP
                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof
QDP
                                  ↳ Narrowing

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(0(x))))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(1(0(1(x))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule 02(0(0(0(x)))) → 12(1(0(1(x)))) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:

02(0(0(0(0(0(1(x0))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(x0)))))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(11(x0))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(01(x0)))))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(01(x0)))))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x0))))))))))



↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                    ↳ QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                            ↳ QDP
                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof
                                ↳ QDP
                                  ↳ Narrowing
QDP
                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(0(x))))
12(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 02(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(1(x0))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(x0)))))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(11(x0))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(01(x0)))))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(01(x0)))))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x0))))))))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                    ↳ QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                            ↳ QDP
                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof
                                ↳ QDP
                                  ↳ Narrowing
                                    ↳ QDP
                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
QDP
                                          ↳ Narrowing

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(0(x))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(1(x0))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(x0)))))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(11(x0))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(01(x0)))))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(01(x0)))))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x0))))))))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule 02(0(0(0(0(0(11(x0))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(01(x0))))))) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:

02(0(0(0(0(0(11(y0))))))) → 12(1(1(1(0(1(01(y0)))))))



↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                    ↳ QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                            ↳ QDP
                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof
                                ↳ QDP
                                  ↳ Narrowing
                                    ↳ QDP
                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                        ↳ QDP
                                          ↳ Narrowing
QDP
                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(0(x))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(1(x0))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(x0)))))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(11(y0))))))) → 12(1(1(1(0(1(01(y0)))))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(01(x0)))))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x0))))))))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                    ↳ QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                            ↳ QDP
                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof
                                ↳ QDP
                                  ↳ Narrowing
                                    ↳ QDP
                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                        ↳ QDP
                                          ↳ Narrowing
                                            ↳ QDP
                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof
QDP
                                                  ↳ Narrowing

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(0(x))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(1(x0))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(x0)))))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(01(x0)))))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x0))))))))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule 02(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(01(x0)))))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x0)))))))))) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:

02(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(01(y0)))))))))) → 12(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(0(11(y0))))))))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(01(y0)))))))))) → 12(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(0(11(y0))))))))))



↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                    ↳ QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                            ↳ QDP
                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof
                                ↳ QDP
                                  ↳ Narrowing
                                    ↳ QDP
                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                        ↳ QDP
                                          ↳ Narrowing
                                            ↳ QDP
                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                                ↳ QDP
                                                  ↳ Narrowing
QDP
                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

02(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(01(y0)))))))))) → 12(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(0(11(y0))))))))))
12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(0(x))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(1(x0))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(x0)))))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(0(01(y0)))))))))) → 12(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(0(11(y0))))))))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ RuleRemovalProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ Narrowing
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPToSRSProof
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ QTRS Reverse
                    ↳ QTRS
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ QTRS Reverse
                      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                            ↳ QDP
                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof
                                ↳ QDP
                                  ↳ Narrowing
                                    ↳ QDP
                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                        ↳ QDP
                                          ↳ Narrowing
                                            ↳ QDP
                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                                ↳ QDP
                                                  ↳ Narrowing
                                                    ↳ QDP
                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

12(0(0(1(x)))) → 02(0(0(0(x))))
02(0(0(0(0(0(1(x0))))))) → 12(1(0(0(0(0(0(x0)))))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

0(0(0(0(x)))) → 1(1(0(1(x))))
1(0(0(1(x)))) → 0(0(0(0(x))))
1(0(0(0(0(0(01(x))))))) → 0(0(0(0(1(0(11(x)))))))
1(0(0(11(x)))) → 0(0(0(01(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.